Showing posts with label Reagan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reagan. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Ronald Reagan: Phony Hero

Huffpo's Robert L. Borosage does a succinct critique of Reagan and how great he wasn't. Unlike me, he's too sophisticated to break out the 'c' word... but I'll say it loud and proud: Ronald Reagan was a c*nt and probably the worst thing to hit America since Columbus imported small pox.

Take a good look at the conservative mantra that Reagan championed: less spending, low taxes, deregulation, free trade, strong military, family values. On all of these, the Gipper and conservatives got it wrong.

Less spending... Reagan doubled the military budget in peacetime (up 50 percent in real terms)... Less spending turned out to mean slash programs that support the weak and the vulnerable.

Low taxes turned into successive tax cuts for the rich.

Free trade was... for multinational companies and banks. Under Reagan, America began shipping jobs rather than goods abroad.

Deregulation gutted consumer protection, environmental protection, workplace safety and the right to organize.

Strong military entailed wasting literally hundreds of billions of dollars on weapons we did not need.

Talk about false idols. Despite all the Gipper deification by today's wingnuts, Reagan was a nothing but a phony hero, a squandered presidency and a horrible gift that just keeps giving. If you want great Republican presidents, you can look to Lincoln, Eisenhower, Obama... Hell, Reagan wasn't fit to polish even Nixon's loafers.

But maybe I miss the point. Maybe the phony hero is the perfect figurehead for a conservative movement that's always used phony values to camouflage its authentic nastiness.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Friday, January 7, 2011

Random Picture of the Day


Those authoritarian dweebs at Newsmax are all stoked about Reagan's 100th birthday. Oh my, it's holy Gipper year, a cause for world wide remembrance and rejoicing! But Ronald Reagan's Greatest Laughs?

In typically humorless wingnut style, the Newsmaxers appear not to realize that everybody laughed at the befuddled pr*ck, not with him back in the day.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Friday, September 3, 2010

We Don't Need Your Stinkin' Collective Good...


Tea Party tax protesters: Don't tread on me... I prefer you sh*t on me instead.


I'll say again that it's hard for regular people to understand the whole 'cut taxes for the rich' deal because most of us aren't rich and don't know anyone who is. So, instead, we get the mushroom treatment and have to rely on TV pundits and GOP propagandists to keep us in the dark and feed us bullsh*t. According to them, rich folks hate paying taxes and shouldn't have to. According to them, we proles should feel guilty for hitting up on the wealthy to educate our snot-nosed kids and provide cops to keep us from killing each other. Just because we're too lazy or dumb to get rich, why should they have to pay taxes to help us?

Thanks to the Republicans and those 'moderate' Dems in red districts who play along, we can't even have rational discussions about wealth and social responsibility any more. We, the middle class, are supposed to just tip our hats to our betters, work our fat asses off and let the rich keep all the money... just like in that good ol' fashioned institutionalized class system we were supposed to have left behind in the 18th century. (American Dream... yay!)

According to conservatives, we should not expect the rich to "redistribute" wealth and be more active participants in the civilized, prosperous society we aspire to be. That's just rude and somehow un-American. Like the gods on Mount Olympus, the rich and their money are to be left undisturbed... high above and beyond the petty travails of us mere mortals. They're like the the rich overclass book-ending the abandoned, welfare-dependent underclass. And we're the perpetually screwed middle class picking up the endless slack in the middle.

But in spite of all that, you can still glimpse the real world that exists beyond the Reaganite socio-economic fantasy. Sometimes you get to hear the unfiltered opinions of rich folks themselves like Abigail Disney, Walt's rich-as-f*ck granddaughter, who has this to say about taxes:

One thing I do know is this: In a far stricter tax environment, my grandfather still managed to accumulate and pass on ample funds to make three subsequent generations very comfortable indeed. And as an inheritor I am here to tell you, the estate tax is not as much of a bogeyman as you've been led to believe.

Disney also talks about how the tax system "incentivizes people like me to do good with our wealth" through charity donations and investments in non-profits that help stimulate the economy and provide jobs. This is obviously more constructive than just shoveling untaxed income into banks and sitting on it. She then goes on to talk about countries that really are living the small government, low tax dream conservatives keep pushing:

I have seen the business environment in Liberia, for example, a country with no tax revenues. I suspect even my brilliant grandfather would not have been able to build a successful business there. I have been to places like Sudan and Congo and know what it looks like when there is no 911 to call, no schools and where governments are disinterested in working toward the collective good.

But there's the rub: That awkward concept of the collective good. As much as Abigail Disney makes logical sense, conservatism itself represents the perfection of belief over logic... so her words wouldn't sway a conservative 'mushroom' for a moment. For them, the 'collective good' is anathema because 1) it sounds communist to their ig'nant ear and 2) they prefer to worship alone in a church whose credo is "I got mine, f*ck you".

A conservative doesn't even believe in society, the embodiment of the collective, anyway (see Reagan's sensei Margaret Thatcher). Conservatives are happy instead to take their own futures, their own kids' futures, and offer them in willing sacrifice to the rich on Mount Olympus... So how could they buy into a concept like the collective good that entails actually giving a sh*t about you or your kids? Nope. No sale.

But conservatives aren't like this the world over. For all the dumb whooping and hollering about 'socialist' Europe, at least Europeans - even most conservatives - understand the socilist-y notion of the collective good and how it's inextricably connected with the conservative-y notion of individual self interest. That's why Europeans get to work fewer hours, get paid more and enjoy the kind of healthcare, education and employee rights that America's peasantry wouldn't dare to dream of.

Instead, we seem to believe there's a uniquely American third way to prosperity - some nebulous synthesis of Reaganism, the "American Dream" and unrestrained greed that'll work for us. But it can't because it's BS. Historical examples of other societies from - Mesopotamia forward - demonstrate there are only two choices: either build a prosperous society around the concept of the collective good or become a failed society that says "f*ck the collective good" and lets poverty prevail for all but a tiny minority. There is no third way. There is no precedent for a society that somehow prospers by dead-ending wealth. There has never been a civilization even close to the American conservative ideal that ever made it to the majors.

I don't know how you'd change American minds. But I'd say asking more rich people like Disney what they think about taxes - instead of just believing the words conservatives put in their mouths - would be a great start. I'd say we should start looking at the idea of the collective good in a positive light... not just poke at it with suspicion as if it's something socialistic and foreign like a soccer ball. Hell, we could still be America and believe in the collective good. We wouldn't have to go full Sweden.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

One More Reason Why Reagan Sucked


Never been a fan of Reagan. Never understood the adulation otherwise sane conservatives reserve for him. If you scan through his list of 'achievements' - taking the national debt to stellar proportions, wasting billions on Star Wars, Iran Contra, giving bin Laden his big break in Afghanistan, etc. - there's not much to justify the Reagan worship. Now there's nuclear-armed Pakistan to add to the list:

"The only good thing the United States did for us was to look the other way about an atomic bomb when it suited the United States to do so."


Says a retired senior Pakistani intelligence officer. Adds Jonathan Schwarz at Tiny Revolution:

"And there's more: the Pakistani bomb was probably funded by Saudi Arabia, just as the Iraqi nuclear program was during the nineteen eighties. The Reagan administration was aware of it in both instances, but had other priorities."


Never understood why Eisenhower isn't revered by wingnuts instead. Even being a liberal, I'd cite Eisenhower as one of the best US presidents of modern times. But Reagan? Err... nope.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Monday, November 2, 2009

AIn't That The Truth

"In 1987, after my first visit to the United States, Vice President Bush accompanied me to the airport, and told me: “Reagan is a conservative. An extreme conservative. All the blockheads and dummies are for him.""

Mikhael Gorbachev interviewed by The Nation

Monday, October 19, 2009

Random Picture of the Day Too...


Reagan Bush were obviously too fiscally conservative to bother making pins for the various minorities who weren't going to vote for them and so opted for this totally inoffensive catch-all. For those guys, this constitutes a stroke of genius.