Tuesday, January 4, 2011

More Americans Off Their Meds

The guys behind the Kentucky Creationist Museum were asked their position on unicorns. Were they real? Where are they now? Shouldn't believing in unicorns be exclusively reserved for five-year-old girls? Sayeth they:

The biblical unicorn was a real animal, not an imaginary creature. ... The absence of a unicorn in the modern world should not cause us to doubt its past existence. (Think of the dodo bird. It does not exist today, but we do not doubt that it existed in the past.). ... To think of the biblical unicorn as a fantasy animal is to demean God’s Word, which is true in every detail.

You'd have to be a Christian to say something as insane as this. Otherwise you'd just come off sounding like a common or garden loon. God forbid...



  1. Would we expect anything less from creationists? Even those who are not backwoods inbred types? Afterall, these morons spent tens, maybe hundreds of millions of dollars creating their little fantasy wonderland that they call a "museum."

  2. Well, under that "logic" satyrs and cockatrices were real too...and that doesn't even include the crap in Revelation.

    Isa 13:21 But wild beasts of the desert shall lie there; and their houses shall be full of doleful creatures; and owls shall dwell there, and satyrs shall dance there.

    Jer 8:17 For, behold, I will send serpents and cockatrices among you, which will not be charmed, and they shall bite you, saith the Lord.


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.